Our Sourcing Standards
We are committed to delivering evidence-based nutrition information through rigorous research verification and transparent sourcing practices.
Our Primary Information Sources
Nutrition Wellness Lab draws from five core categories of authoritative sources to ensure accuracy and scientific credibility.
Peer-Reviewed Publications
We prioritise scientific journals including the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nutrients, and the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Each article undergoes independent expert evaluation before inclusion in our content.
- PubMed and Google Scholar indexed
- Impact factor verification
- Author credentials reviewed
Government & Regulatory Bodies
Swiss health authorities, including the Federal Office of Public Health (BAG), alongside European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines and WHO recommendations form the regulatory foundation of our sourcing.
- BAG nutrition guidelines
- EFSA scientific opinions
- WHO dietary recommendations
Professional Organizations
We reference position papers and practice guidelines from recognised professional bodies including the Swiss Association of Nutritionists and international dietetics academies.
- Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Swiss nutrition societies
- International research collaboratives
University Research Centers
Leading academic institutions conduct and publish nutrition research through dedicated research centres. We source from universities with established nutrition and dietetics programs and active research portfolios.
- Swiss university studies
- European research institutions
- Long-term cohort studies
Industry & Trade Associations
We review guidelines from reputable nutrition and food industry bodies, whilst maintaining editorial independence. Industry sources are cross-verified against peer-reviewed literature.
- Food safety standards
- Nutritional databases (USDA, Swissnutrients)
- Cross-referenced for neutrality
Clinical Practice Guidelines
We consult evidence-based practice guidelines developed by multidisciplinary expert panels for nutrition intervention and assessment, ensuring recommendations reflect current best practices.
- Evidence synthesis standards
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Consensus statements
Our Verification Process
Every piece of content undergoes a systematic verification workflow to ensure accuracy, relevance, and compliance with our standards.
Source Identification
Our editorial team identifies primary and secondary sources aligned with our sourcing categories. We prioritise recent publications (within 5–7 years for most topics) and check publication dates against research fields.
Credential Review
We verify author qualifications, institutional affiliations, and funding disclosures. Conflict-of-interest statements are examined to identify potential bias in research or recommendations.
Evidence Assessment
We evaluate study design, sample size, methodology, and statistical rigour. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses receive priority; isolated case studies are contextualised within broader evidence.
Expert Review
Content is reviewed by registered dietitian nutritionists and nutrition scientists before publication. Reviewers assess accuracy, balance, and alignment with current evidence and professional standards.
Citation Documentation
All factual claims are supported by citations. References include publication details, authors, and direct links where available, enabling readers to access original sources independently.
Ongoing Review
Published content is periodically reviewed and updated to reflect emerging research. Outdated information is revised or flagged with publication dates to maintain currency and accuracy.
Transparency & Disclosure Policy
We believe transparency builds trust. This section outlines our disclosure standards and editorial independence commitments.
Editorial Independence
Nutrition Wellness Lab maintains editorial independence from commercial interests. Our editorial decisions are based exclusively on scientific evidence and reader benefit, not commercial considerations.
What We Disclose
- Author credentials and affiliations
- Publication dates and update history
- Funding sources for cited research
- Limitations of scientific evidence
- Any conflicts of interest
- Links to original research sources
Our Commitments
- No sponsored content without labelling
- Corrections published promptly
- Reader feedback considered genuinely
- Scientific consensus prioritised
- No exaggerated claims or hype
- Regular policy review and updates
Content Corrections: If you identify inaccuracies or outdated information, please contact our editorial team. We review all feedback and publish corrections when warranted.
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions about our sourcing practices and verification standards.
Peer review is the gold standard for scientific validation. Independent experts evaluate research methodology, data analysis, and conclusions before publication. This process significantly reduces the risk of publishing inaccurate or methodologically flawed studies. We use peer-reviewed sources as our primary foundation because they represent the most reliable evidence available.
We prioritise recent publications, generally within 5–7 years of writing, depending on the topic. Some foundational nutrition principles remain stable over decades, whilst rapidly evolving areas (like bioactive compounds or personalised nutrition) require more recent citations. Each article includes a publication date, and we regularly update older content as new evidence emerges.
We present the scientific landscape honestly. When evidence is mixed or contested, we explain the different perspectives, the strength of evidence supporting each view, and why disagreement exists. We avoid oversimplifying complexity and acknowledge genuine uncertainty where it exists in the research.
Industry funding is not automatically disqualifying. However, we examine potential conflicts of interest, compare findings against independent research, and disclose funding sources. We apply heightened scrutiny to industry-funded studies and cross-reference claims with non-affiliated researchers' findings.
Yes. We welcome feedback on sourcing, accuracy, and topic suggestions. Contact our editorial team with your suggestions or concerns. All feedback is reviewed and considered as part of our commitment to continuous improvement.
We conduct regular reviews of published content on a rolling basis. High-impact topics and rapidly evolving areas are reviewed more frequently. When significant new evidence emerges, we update relevant articles and note the revision date. Readers can see when content was last updated at the bottom of each article.
Our Sourcing Team
Content verification is overseen by registered dietitian nutritionists and nutrition scientists with extensive research and clinical experience.
Editorial Director
Oversees sourcing standards, reviewer selection, and evidence synthesis protocols.
Credentials: MSc Nutrition, registered dietitian with 12+ years clinical and research experience.